[Review] Joker: a lesson in cinema


It is hoped that in turn, Joker arrives in theaters this Wednesday. Bringing dire expectations of DC Entertainment’s artistic turnaround but also roles that have become iconic after Jack Nicholson and Heath Ledger’s appearances in theaters, Joker wanted to show that supervillain films can be illustrated in a different way than a flood of special effects films. A look back at the year-end film phenomenon.

After a long period of inconsistency and trying in vain to keep up with the tone of Marvel films, DC inaugurated a decidedly more mature and promising genre with Joker. Hosted by one of the best of his generation in the person of Joaquin Phoenix, the iconic character from DC Comics has finally offered himself a special film in which he can express all his subtleties. You might as well tell you right away: the bet worked. Joker tells the story of a change, namely Arthur Fleck, a man who was lost and despised by society who will gradually turn into the person we know as Batman’s mortal enemy. In 1980s Gotham City New York style, we follow this character confined to a degrading odd job, a clown among clowns who nurture dreams of being a comedian, on the fringes of reality,

Arthur Fleck is just one man among others trying his best to survive in the midst of a harsh capitalist society where the violence of the rich class is perpetrated on the poor as well as on the “left behind”. “. to account.” Among them, people of a forgotten nation where each came first. Those who succeeded on one side, such as Thomas Wayne, the city’s leading figure in the mayoral race (and father of young Bruce), or Murray. , host of the show’s end played by Robert de Niro in full swing, and plebs on the other hand, plunge into the endless night of a rat-infested trash city.

read more: Eternals streaming ita, Venom 2 streaming ita, Shang-Chi streaming ita, Red Notice streaming ita, No Time to Die streaming ita, After 3 streaming ita, Dune streaming ita, Zlatan streaming ita, Army of Thieves streaming ita, My Hero Academia: World Heroes’ Mission streaming ita

The Joker finds in this resonance not only with the 1980s in the United States, where the American dream finally came to an end after the second oil shock plunged The rise of populism around the world or the recent yellow vest movement in France is perfectly represented by the Joker, who in his narrative portrays the crisis of confidence embodied by radical anti-elite discourse among some. This is how, apart from himself, the Joker will become a symbol of this movement in which anarchy becomes the only viable model for anger that has lasted too long. An emphatic punk story in which “no future” is embodied in the person of Arthur Fleck, who has become a symbol of Gotham City’s anarchy in the throes of fire.

a fait beaucoup pour un « simple » film de super-héros. Avant tout car Arthur Fleck n’a pas de pouvoir, mais surtout car Joker va puiser davantage du côté du cinéma de Scorsese, l’esthétique noire, un brin crade et au réalisme assumé, loin du côté films aseptisé de cedes Marvel qu’on a pu voir par le passé chez DC. Qui sait où Todd Philips, le réalisateur, est parti chercher son inspiration, mais les doutes sur ses capacités produire un chef-d’oeuvre après avoir porté la trilogie Very Bad Trip se sont définitivement envolés.

Here, there are no special effects, no endless action scenes, no blaring music without justification. We only find this feeling of loneliness with Joaquin Phoenix who perfectly embodies this character on the fringes of society, always out of the world, a step beyond standards. The actor’s play perfectly portrays this striking characteristic of Arthur Fleck, and provokes a strange feeling in the audience, between disgust and awe. Whether it’s at the level of his facial expressions, the way he dances, to the rigidity of his movements, we find this bilateral point of view, between empathy and disgust for Arthur Fleck’s character.

But if the Joker has several levels of reading that are interesting to each other, the big screen will feel bland without the main character. Joaquin Phoenix gives here one of his best, if not his best, performances. His ability to go from cold laughter to tears in a matter of seconds while letting us read the despair in his eyes fascinates audiences, mesmerized by so much mastery. There’s no doubt that the actor has just won his entrance ticket to the Oscars, offering a new version of Joker among the most convincing ever seen in theaters.

Never fall for easen mental illness or exaggeration, Joker portrays a fair and sharp critique of financial and media symbolic violence, and the ultra-violent response of the self-confident person, involving the entire society behind it. A film that wants to be realistic without ever taking the viewer to task, only leaving him to witness the birth of a deep evil lurking in the shadows and nurtured for a long time by an ailing society. With all due respect to the skeptics who believe that the Joker legitimizes violence, this film is more of a spectacle. This is how someone who just wants to “put a smile on their face” people ends up blowing up, being fooled by the madness of the world. That’s why Joker is such a good movie.